Written by Dr. Melik Peter Khoury
Transformation has an ending. Adaptation does not.
For over a decade, I told the same story about Unity Environmental University. We must transform from a caterpillar to a butterfly.
It was a good story. It was also the only one the sector was willing to hear. Higher education loves metamorphosis because metamorphosis is safe. It promises that the ugly part is temporary, that the pain has a schedule, and that something beautiful is waiting at the end of it. Boards find that comforting. Employees find it survivable. Donors find it fundable.
And the biology held up longer than most metaphors do. Inside the chrysalis, the caterpillar does not politely rearrange itself. It dissolves. Almost everything it was becomes liquid, and a small cluster of cells that were there the whole time rebuilds the animal out of that liquid.
That is a fair description of what we did. We sold the residential campus. We froze tuition. We changed our governance and operating model. We built a ninety-credit bachelor’s degree while the sector defended one hundred twenty (sometimes more). We took enrollment up fifteen times over and operating cash reserves up twenty times over. We did not optimize the old animal. We liquefied it.
So I am not disowning the metaphor. I am retiring it, with respect, because it has one flaw I can no longer work around.
A butterfly is a final draft.
That is the flaw in how this entire sector thinks about change. We treat transformation as an event with a finish line. Endure the disruption. Unveil the new structure. Declare victory. Then spend the next twenty years protecting the thing we just built from the next disruption. The transformed institution quietly becomes another institution that cannot transform.
The real question for the next ten years is not what we are becoming. It is what kind of animal can keep becoming things.
To continue reading, view the full post here
